Jump to content

Talk:C and D-class destroyer/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 17:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Maybe add a couple images to the service section - right now it's pretty much a big "wall-o-text". This isn't a requirement for GA though, just a suggestion.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Everything looks to be in order, excellent work as usual, Sturmvogel. Parsecboy (talk) 17:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]