Talk:CVU

Counter Vandalism Unit

I agree with several other editors that self-reference to the WP:CVU is appropriate here. The argument that users >> editors is somewhat valid, still, look at other pages such as RFA, RFC, AFD, etc. Many editors probably wander across this page looking for WP:CVU, only to have there time wasted. It seems courteous to editors, who are contributors and not just users, to make wikiedia more navigable. I too was ready to add the self ref template only to find the DO NOT message placed there. There has been no discussion on this aside from a minor revert scuffle and there is no consensus.—Gaff ^ταλκ 22:24, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I was going to add that here as well only to find that message. I really thing it should be on here because, just like RFA and the others gaff posted, they have it, so why not this? If anyone has any reason why WP:CVU should not be on this page, please speak now. Otherwise i think we should just put wp:cvu on this page. Thanks! EvilHom3r 16:32, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to add CVU n all, but saw that message. Ryan4314 (talk) 00:01, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]