Talk:CTV Comedy Channel

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian television.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Criticism section

The criticism section really should be cut. Genuine criticism of The Comedy Network would be fine, but the section as is doesn't have a leg to stand on and is certainly not encyclopedic in style. I tried to delete it, but it's been restored. Why keep it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.226.9.193 (talk) 03:12, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it again, anyone who wishes to write a proper critisism category is more than welcome too, however please to not reinstate the old one as it is unsourced and biased. Bliss 182 (talk) 04:15, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would like something added to imply that a large number of Canadians don't like that they can't access the Comedy Central links because Comedy Network rarely has the content online when the show airs and degrades the experience. Can we get a few people to agree and then someone write something? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.68.46.150 (talk) 05:09, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

logo

Does anyone know why Comedy messes around with Comedy Central's logo on their shows, by putting a really ugly Comedy Logo over it? I mean, honestly, doesn't that seem stupid to anyone else? --68.150.69.36 22:22, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They do this with only 2 shows, I think, which are The Daily Show and The Colbert Report. --Von 08:40, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They simulcast those shows from Comedy Central and as such, they have no way to remove the comedy central logo (bug) from the screen. The Comedy Network wants their logo to be seen so they have to put it over the other logo. CTV does the same thing when they air soap operas in the afternoon--BoyoJonesJr 22:59, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I dont care about the logo, but someone should tell them to stop fucking up the commercial timings on Daily show and the report. --Gerash77 03:27, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV tag

This concerns POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 00:28, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is not CTV Comedy Channel yet

The CTV Comedy name change did not take effect yet. All official information about the channel still refers to it as The Comedy Network ^[1] ^[2]

For the record, I'm becoming increasingly doubtful about whether the rebrand is actually happening at all anymore. They announced this whole rebranding bonanza (Comedy Network → CTV Comedy Channel, Bravo → CTV Drama Channel, Space → CTV Sci-Fi Channel, Gusto → CTV Life Channel ) in June of last year, but as of March 2019 it still hasn't happened. I don't know whether they changed their minds entirely, or whether it just got delayed for some reason, but...I just don't know. Bearcat (talk) 13:58, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It got delayed. Obviously.MarcoPolo250 (talk) 12:24, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

The Big Bang Theory

Why on earth do you have to show this god awful program a hundred times a day? 2001:569:5360:5500:FC71:276C:E997:BB08 (talk) 05:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.thecomedynetwork.ca/Company/AboutUs

[2] ttps://www.bellmedia.ca/the-lede/tv/comedy-2/

[1]

[2]