Talk:CTNow

Connecticut C‑class Mid‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

There's inconsistency in the italicization of publication names. "Advocate" doesn't have to be italicized, I think, but I can't be bothered to fix it right now. Maybe someone else? 71.235.202.144 04:21, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why the separate pages for the individual papers were consolidated, but so be it. The Hartford Advocate is a great paper, but the section on it is too long and contains too much detail about a couple early staffers, without mentioning most of the other many people who have worked there. I trimmed it down a bit. 163.192.21.43 14:52, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Ctnow-cover09202018.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:06, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]