Talk:CRA International/Archive 1
Appearance
This is an archive of past discussions about CRA International. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Discussion
Hi! I just created this article. I think I followed all the rules but give me a shout if I botched anything. Thanks! 5forty4fifty (talk) 16:47, 14 January 2009 (UTC)5forty
Why?
This reads like a corporate ad, not a Wiki entry. Why is this company notable? What point of view does it represent? Whom does it work for? Has there been any controversy about its work? I ask because I am currently watching a company representative on C-SPAN testifying against the Administration's new energy bill, giving reasons that I consider specious.--Cherlin (talk) 22:21, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well, it's only one item, but consultants from Charles River Associates produced a fairness report in the matter of the sale of BC Rail to CN Rail, which has been since widely discredited by other bidders in what has since become known as a tainted process in re the BC Legislature Raids and the associated scandal known as Railgate. Charles River has refused comment on the falsehoods in the report, saying that those consultants are no longer with the firm, and that they are not responsible. Notability requires three press citations; I can probably find three just for that circumstance but there might be others.....Skookum1 (talk) 13:16, 30 June 2009 (UTC)