Talk:COVID-19 protests in Australia
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the COVID-19 protests in Australia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Protests over responses to the COVID-19 pandemic was copied or moved into COVID-19 protests in Australia. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of COVID-19 pandemic in Australia was copied or moved into COVID-19 protests in Australia. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Split
[edit]I think that the New South Wales and Victoria sections of this page should be split into different articles because of how much information and how many protests there have been in these states. Maybe even make the Queensland section an article too. Any thoughts? Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 03:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- I agree, the subheaders for Victoria is too long and could be briefer, more concise and more hollistic. For this we could write shorter description, then use a 'See Also' or 'Further information'. or
- This could also be applied to New South Wales and Queensland.
- I oppose removing the whole article as this is a useful landing page, especially when coming from Protests against responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and wanting to find out about the Australian protests during this time.
- Thanks Neb (talk) 09:43, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- I am not proposing the deletion of this page. I just want to move it into at least the NSW and Victoria pages, maybe also Queensland and other states. Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 11:09, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose, I don't believe the amount of material in the article justifies a split and if anything the article can do with some trimming. TarnishedPathtalk 13:35, 3 August 2024 (UTC)