The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19 articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
(0) New confirmed cases calculated per day basis for convenience and written to "previous" day, so, e.g. data for March-30 10:00 ( 5 cases ) and March-29 22:00 ( 57 cases ) was reported as 62 cases for March-29
(1) Death rate defined as ratio of total current deaths to total current confirmed cases
(2) Positive tests rate defined as ratio of new confirmed test cases to new tests number corresponding to last day
(0) New confirmed cases calculated per day basis for convenience and written to "previous" day, so, e.g. data for March-30 10:00 ( 5 cases ) and March-29 22:00 ( 57 cases ) was reported as 62 cases for March-29
(1) Death rate defined as ratio of total current deaths to total current confirmed cases
(2) Positive tests rate defined as ratio of new confirmed test cases to new tests number corresponding to last day
(3) Ukraine define unit of testing on "suspicious case" basis - it is a person with symptoms of COVID-19 or some person that contact with such suspicious person. Single person could be tested several times ( average value is 2.5 ) along the course of treatment ( to ensure treatment was successful )
In the article we have a table of statistics that an editor has changed.[18] I have put the new and old versions above. Most of the data in the table seemed to be calculated from available statistics.
The main benefit of the table seemed to be that it collated data on test results like this.[19] This data is no longer in the table.
I do not know what the source is for the new data. The links do not work. If the table cannot be supported in its old form, maybe we should delete it and replace it with tables that can be supported by citations to sources with links that really work. Toddy1(talk)10:02, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
as currently reported number of deaths is 3,400 and not 3,584.
3,584 is a number of new cases on 09/17/2020
This causes this wrong number propagation to all kinds of other systems including Google Search and reporting a sudden spike in deaths to 240+ a day, when previously well below 100. ISashaTC (talk) 19:47, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Aha. I see - upon submit, wikipedia software modifies the URL and removes the dot at the end: The path is "operativna-informacija-pro-poshirennja-koronavirusnoi-infekcii-2019-ncov WITH A DOT".
For some reason, gov.ua decided to put a DOT at the end. Maybe two dots work, wikipedia removes one and the 2nd one remains? Let's try ...
[1]
Na, it doesn't work. It won't even work when putting \ or " to the dot URL. Two dots, three dots, nothing works.
"Instead, they were asking European countries to help with the vaccines." is almost literally in the source, I was actually afraid it can be taken as close paraphrasing;
Failed leadership of the government - it is also literally in the source, and pretty much every source bot under control of Ukrainian government says this - should I find five more? Ten more?--Ymblanter (talk) 14:21, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It should obviously not sound like declaration against vaccination policies by the government, but the government screwed up badly with the vaccination, and pretty much every reliable source noted this (including the three sources I added). There are no independent reliable sources saying the government has done a fantastic job. We must follow reliable sources and say in Wikipedia voice that one of the reasons Ukraine has the vaccination rate ranked 154 in the world were the government actions.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I just spent 1,5 hours updating the article about vaccination and nowhere it is "saying the government has done a fantastic job"....... Including in the article that Ukraine has the vaccination rate ranked 154 in the world is useful information, but anybody with half a brain can conclude from the current state of the article that the Ukrainian authorities are not successfully implementing a vaccination program.... — Yulia Romero • Talk to me!18:39, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not really. Now it says that the vaccination is not going well because the citizens do not want to get vaccinated, and, in addition, there is a campaign against vaccination on the social media. Whereas in fact sources mention the government (the previous one, if I get it right)m as the main problem.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Respectfully I have to say you did not get it right, the Poroshenko administration was not pro-Russian nor is hindering vaccination in Ukraine..... Again I point out that Wikipedia should not put the blame on somebody for things that are/have happened. Currently it seems 20,000 people are vaccinated in Ukraine every day (of the 41,487,960 people living in government controlled Ukraine, according to the English Wikipedia article on Ukraine), let the reader decide if that is good or bad work by the Ukrainian government. You know this man! I got the feeling that you are just venting your personal frustration with the slow vaccination tempo in Ukraine here on Wikipedia. Which is not what Wikipedia is for!
PS The current Ukrainian authorities are not really controlling much Ukrainian media.... especially compared with the Poroshenko and Yanukovych administrations. (I included a source for that information in Wikipedia some time ago, but I can not find it now....) Please don't make it look on Wikipedia that the Ukrainian government is in full control of large parts of the mass media in Ukraine. Unless you have very reliable sources claiming that they have of course. The days Ukraine was comparable with Belarus are over.
PS2 I have been really happy with almost all of your very, very, very many edits and work on Ukrainian related Wikipedia articles Ymblanter. Sorry if I appear to be offensive, but I am merely trying to be honest. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me!19:03, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I was not talking about the Poroshenko administration, which was voted out before the pandemic started. But I see indeed that we are not going anywhere, let us drop it. I am not going to start edit-warring.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]