Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in Germany

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

COVID-19 Mid‑importance

	COVID-19 portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19 articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany High‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Pulmonology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Pulmonology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Viruses Low‑importance

	Viruses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Other talk page banners

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 4 times. The weeks in which this happened:

Section sizes

Section size for COVID-19 pandemic in Germany (34 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	22,726	22,726
Background	15	12,526
Outbreak of a novel coronavirus disease	2,676	2,676
Infection Protection Act	6,333	6,333
National Pandemic Plan	2,353	2,353
Criticism over slow procurement of protective materials	1,149	1,149
Timeline by state	441	48,281
Baden-Württemberg	5,982	5,982
Bavaria	12,731	12,731
Berlin	2,918	2,918
Hamburg	716	716
Hesse	2,330	2,330
Lower Saxony	2,578	2,578
North Rhine-Westphalia	16,325	16,325
Rhineland-Palatinate	1,600	1,600
Saxony-Anhalt	1,125	1,125
Other	377	1,535
Repatriated German citizens	1,158	1,158
Virus variants	3,854	3,854
Government response	86	86
Vaccination	19,170	19,170
Therapy	3,647	3,647
Impact	11	26,938
Economy	9,294	9,294
Introduction of mask requirements	3,976	3,976
Mask shortage and controversies	11,733	11,733
Consumer good shortages	1,924	1,924
Protests against government-imposed restrictions; anti-vaccination	12,441	12,441
Statistics	74	74
See also	300	300
Notes	136	136
References	30	30
Further reading	1,250	1,250
External links	1,657	1,657
Total	153,116	153,116

Archives

Index

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 6 sections are present.

Chart "by age and gender" at the end of the page

Could anyone check the chart "by age and gender" The numbers are 80+ 7,450 13,205 20,655 according to the table on the left and the grapic on the right puts the same segment at 90k+ — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎141.15.29.253 (talk) 08:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

7-day prevalence video since outbreak

Currently, the "7-day prevalence since outbreak" video is broken. It shows a rolling date counter but almost nothing on the map up to about 1:10 (video time) and, at which point also the date freezes at "29-th of July 2021", and then, from 1:26 (video time) onwards, supposedly shows prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 from late April 2021 onwards. 88.130.216.35 (talk) 13:53, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes, the RKI dataset it's based on is incomplete. Since August, extra checks have been added to prevent such uploads. -- Xplus1 (talk) 01:10, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hasn't been updated for a month (since 2022-02-08), since the 7-day cases/100,000 tally first broke through 1500. Demoralization? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.52.207.45 (talk) 11:34, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fake news

From this article "risk of death of "over-65-year-olds [is] at 50%" - That was pure fake news to create anxiety. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.185.37.144 (talk) 06:57, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Badly in need of updating (September 2022)

The main text of the article doesn't seem to have been updated since November 2021; the maps not since early 2022. I can't do it as it is closed to editing. 98.115.160.165 (talk) 10:21, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistency between graph and table

The graph of daily deaths shows deaths dwindling well below 100/day in December 2022, while the tablulated data right next to the graph show deaths averaging above 100/day in December 2022. Which one is in error? 98.115.160.165 (talk) 03:26, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problem solved by removing the more reliable tabulated data and retaining the less reliable graphed data? : / 98.115.160.165 (talk) 12:40, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The cited reference data -- Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Germany medical cases chart -- show the death rate rising to an average of 175 deaths per day for the first week of January 2023, while the graph shows deaths substantailly under 100 deaths per day. Is the graphed data coming from a source other than the cited source, or is it being misplotted? This discrepancy needs to be addressed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.115.160.165 (talk) 20:55, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source for "pandemic of the unvaccinated" declarations

On 4 November, as almost 34,000 reported infections set a new record since the beginning of the pandemic, Health Minister Jens Spahn spoke of a "massive pandemic of the unvaccinated". While, as far as I know, Spahn did indeed use these words, which were widely reported back then, the BBC article has been edited and no longer has this passage. The original article contained this wording (archive), it was removed within the following 24 hours (archive). I marked this as failed verification, since it needs a new source. MarioGom (talk) 15:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]