Talk:CNN Coverage of Sago Mine Disaster

Cleanup

I'm not disputing the validity of this article, but I think it could use some grammar and style cleanup. I did a bit, but I've tagged it so someone with more time and interest can pay more attention to it. Crunch 02:26, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you removed the tag. It's there to help the article. Hopefully, someone else won't come by and tag the page for deletion because of its poor grammar and questionable worth. 03:50, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Merge

Please see discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CNN Coverage of Sago Mine Disaster. Merging into 2006 Sago Mine disaster seems like the best course of action. howch e ng {chat} 08:41, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've merged it. Don't put it back as the content will just be duplicated from the main page. How CNN covered this, with hundreds and hundreds of other reporters and outlets on the CNN is not worthy of its own page and barely worthy of it's own section on the main page. --Ben