Talk:CNA Financial

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on September 26. The result of the discussion was keep.

Untitled

This a very important page, and however put that comment please come forward. bobsmith319. I have worked ver hard on this article please don't remove it.

Hi, bobsmith319. Please sign discussion posts using --~~~~ or the signature button on the edit window. Now that the article has been nominated for AFD the process must proceed by policy, and only an administrator can close an AFD. Removing tags such as the importance or cleanup tags is also frowned on unless you substantially address the reason they were added in the first place; they're there for the article, not to slam you. This is a fine start to an article (see WP:STUB), but needs much more to be complete. Tags are ways to alert other editors to come in and improve the article, so you don't have to do all the work yourself. It works better this way, trust me. --Dhartung | Talk 06:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for you help. bobsmith319.

To -- bobsmith319 -- why did you change my text "Continental Assurance Company of North America" to "Continental insurance Company of North America"? The "Assurance" is in fact correct. SunSw0rd 19:49, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I think you are right. bobsmith319.

Added the CNA Foundation section. Will add more material as time permits. -- SunSw0rd 13:49, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds great thanks, bobsmith319.

Dropped reference to Loews owning "watches and clocks". They sold Bulova to Citizen Watch in January 2008. http://www.jckonline.com/article/CA6495638.html --DAW0001 (talk) 00:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Propaganda Written by CNA -- SHOULD BE DELETED

"Our focus has been on professionalism, integrity, and commitment to our policyholders and distributors. Today, CNA looks forward to building on its track record of success."

Most or all of this entry was written by a CNA employee from a first person perspective, and should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.16.162.138 (talk) 16:07, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Criminal investigation section

I am unable to access the newsarticle anywhere online, as it seems to be behind a paywall. Also, does anyone know how the saga ended up? If so, please post it in the Wikipedia article. Thanks! Hanxu9 (talk) 20:55, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is here: http://articles.latimes.com/2011/may/24/nation/la-na-iraq-claims-20110524

and here: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-05-23/cna-may-face-criminal-probe-on-iraq-insurance-propublica-says.html

213.66.81.80 (talk) 18:25, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

COI tag

As per this. Tag should stay til someone independent of the company reviews this article carefully and confirms they have done so here. Jytdog (talk) 15:55, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i checked it. tagged a couple things needing citations, otherwise seems OK. Jytdog (talk) 16:49, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CNA Financial. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160215065320/http://www.dowjones.com/ to http://www.dowjones.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:45, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Self-promotion

This article reads like a press release. Nothing wrong with press releases, but Wikipedia is not a press agent. The grammar is also off throughout the article's effective bullet-point list of CNA achievements. I'm not sure if it's NPOV, encyclopedic tone, or what, but this article is not suitable for Wikipedia as-is. Thenarius (talk) 02:43, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]