Talk:CMA CGM Benjamin Franklin

Untitled

Looks great Ainsley! Couple of small suggestions -

you might want to put Benjamin Franklin in italics wherever it appears in your article.
Also, I loved that picture you did for CA2 illustrating the difference in scale between 8000 TEU and 18000 TEU -- would you consider adding it to the article to illustrate that section? Just a thought.
On your References, try to put as much information as you can (author, date, etc). Right now you just have a title or a link, and that's not quite enough.
Instead of using "-", Wikipedia has a way of making actual bullet points, for the things you have listed under "Environmental Initiatives". In the Source editor, just enter an asterisk.

Kairyth (talk) 22:51, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Amanlapaz. Peer reviewers: Stephenrosenfeld.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review by Stephen

1) Organization Website. It would appear that the Bureau Veritas help support the website for the purpose of educating people interested in maritime topics. For the most part, there should be little bias. There doesn't appear to be one specific author as it is not listed but the website does seem to be official, which means they probably provide reliable information.

2) Company Website. Created by CMA CGM who owns the ship so they may introduce some bias into whatever information they provide. Something to watch out for when using what they provide. There is no author cited but there is press contact info at the bottom so people can contact them. While this does not lend credibility to the article, whoever wrote this article probably knows what they are talking about since they work for the company that made the ship.

3) Organization Website. Maritime Matters is paying for this website to provide the public with information about maritime topics, there should be little bias unless he is being payed by a company. Martin Cox, the author, lists his credentials such as writing a book so it would appear he knows what he is talking about.

4) News Article. Written by the Daily Breeze to provide information about the new era of megaships. Should be little bias as the author does not work for CMA CGM. No credentials are given for the author so there is no real way to tell if he knows what he is talking about.

5) News Article. Written by CBC News under its Business category and payed for by them to provide readers information about the new ship, little to no bias from the author, No author given except that it was written by CBC News so no way to check credentials.

6) Company Manual. Written by B&W, this manual goes over nearly every thing about the engines on the ship. Payed for by B&W but should have little bias as it is all about engines. Created by the same people who made the engines so hopefully they know what they are talking about.

7) Company Website. Written by CMA CGM to advertise how great the ship is so a lot of bias there but mainly only facts are provided, which can't really be changed. No author cited or credentials given but again, it is written by the creators of the ship so it should be accurate.

8) Organization PDF. Written by the the World Shipping Council to provide updated information about port congestion. Paid for by the council so it may have some bias in how the information is presented. No author is given but the credentials of the Council more than make up for that.

All in all, very well done Ainsley. I only put bold in one part because you repeat lowest twice. Last thing, make all of the references look the same in format.

Port of Los Angeles

The ship docked at the Port of Los Angeles, not Long Beach. Though adjacent, they are distinct...

Tried to correct it where I saw it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.164.112.230 (talk) 21:51, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yep [1]. --Ronz (talk) 02:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]