Talk:CK Infrastructure Holdings
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 9 June 2017
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Hard to see why it was even proposed so soon after the renaming, other than by assuming that the nom just didn't bother to read WP:AT despite being asked nicely in several places. Happens a lot. See my closing comment. Andrewa (talk) 20:52, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Cheung Kong Infrastructure Holdings → CK Infrastructure Holdings – Company name changed with effect from 10th May, 2017 112.119.0.78 (talk) 16:22, 9 June 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Anarchyte (work | talk) 15:57, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose WP:NAMECHANGES states that the name most commonly used should be preferred, even after an official name change, but that extra weight should be given to sources after the name change. My Google search "Cheung Kong Infrastructure" after 10 May shows Cheung Kong is still in use by the company itself, the Financial Times, Bloomberg News and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. CK may come to be the common name, but it isn't yet. —A L T E R C A R I ✍ 02:56, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- Closing comment: Suggest anyone puzzled by this read wp:official names, and a more polite version of wp:another baseless nomination would be welcome too. Andrewa (talk) 20:52, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.