Talk:CKMP-FM/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Neutralhomer (talk · contribs) 22:39, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
Prose is fine, no copyvios, no problems with spelling or grammar.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
No problems here.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:
No problems here.

B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
Reference #20 is 404'd, that will need changed. I would like to see a couple more references for the "breast implant" and "Bank It or Burn It" controversies. The second and fourth paragraphs of the "2014 'QuickHitz' re-launch" section, I feel, need a couple more references as well.

C. No original research:
No OR.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Covers the major aspects of the station....

B. Focused:
...while staying focused.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Article written with an NPOV.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
No edit wars.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
A logo for the station is typically used on the page (within the infobox). One can be found here. If possible, a photo of the station's studio building would be nice, but not necessary.

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
No images provided.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Failed: Sorry, but with no movement on the article page or this GA page in the 48 hours since the review, I can't pass the article in it's current state. Please update the article with the above corrections and try again. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 22:56, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]