Talk:CJ7

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Hong Kong Cinema (assessed as Low-importance).

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (18)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (295)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,054)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,475) • Stub-Class articles (6,684)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (388) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,337)

Film: Chinese

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Chinese cinema task force.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rumors

This article uses the word "rumor" way too much. If no citations are given for all of the sentences using this word are not given in the next couple of days, I will delete the lot of them. --Ghostexorcist 06:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've added sources where possible and re-worded / removed where not. Gram123 08:44, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Xu Jiao

Her Chinese name is 徐嬌 or in Pinyin xú jiāo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.102.121.170 (talk) 13:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC) link titlecj7[reply]

Rewrite?

We have a lot more information on this film now, it's even out in Hong Kong. I think a rewrite is in order, anyone agree?NiGHTS into Dreams... (talk) 02:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree someone needs to rewrite the plot rather then having 4 points of rumours. RiseDarthVader (talk) 01:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Sunny" by Boney M.

Does anyone here who knows how to add one of this prominent film soundtrack inside that article? 218.208.227.136 (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Critical Reception

I've never been a big fan of using review "aggregators" such as Rotten Tomatoes on film articles in Wikipedia - I don't think it adds an awful lot to an article, and they don't necessarily agree with one another due to varying sources - however I do understand why people like to use them. I notice on this article that the Rotten Tomatoes scores for Shaolin Soccer (90%) and Kung Fu Hustle (89%) have been cited, to show how CJ7 (45%) didn't fare anywhere near as well in reviews as those two films.

However, the same comparisons have not been afforded to the other aggregator mentioned, Metacritic. On the Metacritic site, the scores for Chow's previous two films are notably lower (68/100 and 78/100 respectively) and their current score for CJ7 is higher (55/100), making the differences between the reviews (and therefore the implied quality of the films) seem distinctly less substantial.

Using only one set of aggregate comparisons (either one) could be seen as selection bias. On Rotten Tomatoes, the gulf in % scores between Shaolin Soccer and CJ7 is a quite sensational 45%. On Metacritic it is a meagre 13%. I suggest that we use neither aggregator, or if we must, then both / all (and I guess any other 'approved' aggregators). Gram123 (talk) 16:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CJ7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081012220942/http://twitchfilm.net:80/archives/007688.html to http://www.twitchfilm.net/archives/007688.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:55, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]