Talk:CIA activities in Nicaragua

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Nicaragua Low‑importance

	Nicaragua portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nicaragua, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nicaragua on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NicaraguaWikipedia:WikiProject NicaraguaTemplate:WikiProject NicaraguaNicaragua articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Espionage Low‑importance

	CIA activities in Nicaragua is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 1 August 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to Central Intelligence Agency activities in Nicaragua. The result of the discussion was not moved.

english edit

just hitting low-hanging fruit Elinruby (talk) 19:00, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Opening paragraph

The opening paragraph is about earlier history of Nicaragua, not American involvement in Nicaragua. The CIA is never even mentioned, and it is one of the subjects of this article. We need a new, more informative opening paragraph, since the current one is irrelevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.143.228.187 (talk) 23:13, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

White Propaganda

The way this article was written when I found it, "White Propaganda" was capitalized and sometimes in quotes, eg. "The 'White Propaganda' operation." I am going to edit the article presuming that is merely a result of the poor English of the article, and that it is actually referring to white propaganda as a type of campaign, rather the proper name of a particular operation. Please correct me if I am wrong. Sondra.kinsey (talk) 13:27, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on CIA activities in Nicaragua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:48, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:CIA activities in Iraq which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:35, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Job

This is much better than the bulk of CIA articles that have "allegations of" in the title. I wish this were the dominant style, this is all I've been trying to say, it's very much possible to write an entry that isn't slanted without having to resort to calling it "allegations". I promise to bring some credible secondary and tertiary sources to this page in due time. Jester6482 (talk) 22:25, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright I went looking and while I initially came up pretty empty handed, I'm pretty sure this is a secondary source, albeit from 1985; it's been archived here on Time Magazine and it corroborates much of the article:

Anticommunist goals of the Reagan admin & CIA training p.7: "The Administration asserts that its aim is to harass the Sandinista government until it stops trying to foment Communist revolution throughout Central America. The main instrument for achieving this is CIA training, arming and financing of the contra guerrillas who are waging war against the Sandinistas." This citation could go right after "The United States saw the Sandinistas as Communists, and felt the need to stop them." as well as: "The CIA also supplied the Contras with training and equipment" in the article.

Mining of harbors p.9: "The mining had begun about a month before the House Intelligence Committee briefing."

as well as providing a bunch of details on the role of director Casey not yet mentioned in this article. It's called "No Place Left to Hide" by George J. Church: https://time.com/archive/6884119/no-place-left-to-hide/

I will continue to look it over, if someone could verify that 1. This qualifies as a secondary source and 2. It's a secondary source Wikipedia will accept, I will read more of it and add the citations. Jester6482 (talk) 00:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested style guide for this article