Talk:CGIAR

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Agriculture High‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa Mid‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Science

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Tellingtales (talk · contribs) has been paid by International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center. Disclosed here that they are in communications department for Center

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

The hyperlinked CG centers within the CGIAR article in wikipedia should link to other wikipedia articles. Either the links should bring to an external webpage (the center itself) or an article about the center should be created in wikipedia.--83.103.94.4 08:16, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Single source / Press release /copypaste

This article, as well as the 16 articles on CGIAR sub entities in the article's infobox, appear to have been copied directly from their websites, and are written like adverts. I've totally rewritten one, but most need to be removed and rewritten for copyvio alone, not to mention the fact that they are all incredibly POV.

If you're looking for a research project, here's a good one. I'm also removing the "start" tag from these articles, as an unreferenced copyvio doesn't meet "start" criteria. T L Miles (talk) 17:05, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Awhile back I re-wrote the introduction section so it's hopefully more balanced and useful now. I think these concerns still apply to the rest of the article though. Foonarres (talk) 17:25, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

During rewrite, please note that since the dropping of the full name, CGIAR does not take the defite article, so "CGIAR" not "the CGIAR"—GRM (talk) 09:40, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Starting point for a more balanced article

http://www.lobbywatch.org/profile1.asp?PrId=295 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.154.190.241 (talk) 04:58, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unable to reach the lobbywatch website. Suggest this entire section be deleted. JeremyCherfas (talk) 13:51, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dublin Process

The history section is now out of date. The CGIAR has just signed an agreement with the AUC to back an African science agenda for agriculture. This is part of the ongoing 'Dublin Process' to align the CG's research with CAADP in Africa. I need historical information on the initiation and progress of this process, but can only find information related to 'Dublin 2'... Please help by updating this article. Thanks—GRM (talk) 12:06, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with CGIAR Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers

Consortium article completely overlaps with CGIAR article; merge DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 22:47, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this proposal. The name 'CGIAR Consortium' was created in 2011, but I think it's clear (from looking at http://www.cgiar.org/cgiar-consortium/ and http://www.cgiar.org/who-we-are/history-of-cgiar/) that this is the same organisation as the CGIAR which has existed since 1971, just with a slightly different name. It makes sense for these two articles to be merged since they are about the same organisation. Foonarres (talk) 17:19, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The two articles describe the same organization, and have large (complete) overlap. The CGIAR is the most extensive. Possible solution is to delete the CGIAR Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers and rename the CGIAR article to CGIAR Consortium, following the most recent naming convention as linked by Foonarres. Rwos (talk) 09:20, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support. No-brainer. Lfstevens (talk) 22:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. But note CGIAR and CGIAR Consortium are connected but separate. The CGIAR Consortium (with its member Centers generally known as CGIAR Centers) is one part of a global research partnership referred to as CGIAR (see the diagram on the link http://www.cgiar.org/who-we-are/). CGIAR should remain the title of the main page, with the CGIAR Consortium information incorporated as subsection. User:klchapman 15:38, 14 July 2014 (GMT+1)

The "CGIAR Consortium" and "CGIAR" are one and the same. If you visit the CGIAR website, you will note that they don't want to be referred to as the Consortium anymore. Combine and make it CGIAR only! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frankahilario (talk • contribs) 21:49, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The two are closely related if not identical, and a merge would be straightforward. Proposal has been open for 2+ years without any oppose votes.Dialectric (talk) 02:51, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done

The name changed again to CGIAR System Organization from the official name of Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers (CGIAR) on November 21, 2016 ^[1]. Here is the official document confirming it ^[2]. It's now considered an "independent international organization" and is intended to succeed in title the Consortium of International Research Centers established in 2010 as a "contractual joint venture" by the 15 centers. Someone might want to update this... tellingtales 06:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tellingtales (talk • contribs)

And the reason for the name change is that the governance structure was changed in June 2016, as shown here ^[3] which is linked from the bottom of this page http://www.cgiar.org/about-us/our-governance/ (tellingtales 06:12, 5 March 2017 (UTC))

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on CGIAR. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One CGIAR

Should the One CGIAR "initiative" be its own section, or does it replace sections? For example, this page has a different mission and vision statement than the overall CGIAR. Jbakum (talk) 20:06, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jbakum, it is not clear to me what exactly "One CGIAR actually is. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 12:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.cgiar.org/about-us/our-governance/system-organization/

[2] ttp://library.cgiar.org/handle/10947/2592

[3] ttp://library.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10947/4371/CGIAR%20System%20Framework%20-%20WEB.pdf?sequence=4

[1]

[2]

[3]