Talk:CFCF-DT

Baseball Low‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Quebec / Montreal / Television Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Montreal (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian television.

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Jeopardy on CFCF

The reason Jeopardy is most likely not on CFCF is because NBC affillate WPTZ from Plattsburgh/Burlington carries it. This station does serve the Montreal market, making broadcast on CFCF redundant --Raj Fra 21:05, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Bias

"Back in Montreal, CTV Montreal (formerly CFCF) has always been the number one, top-rated television station for Anglophone Quebeckers."

This whole paragraph is full of bias and was obviously written by a CFCF employee. They even had to put the "(formerly CFCF)" thing that all their press releases have. How cute.

I have accordingly reverted that paragraph back to its original state, minus the shots at CBC and Global.

Mjlarochelle 05:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CTV logo.svg

The image Image:CTV logo.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:20, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge CTV News Montreal

I believe that CTV News Montreal should be merged into this article. A local newscast is not notable enough for its own article. CTV News Montreal is the only local CTV newscast article on here.--MTLskyline (talk) 03:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CTV News Montreal is completely notable enough for its own article. It has enough sources and enough information. Just because it is the only local newscast article on here, that is not a reason to merge it. Other notable local newscasts should have their own articles too; no one has taken the time to create them. Creativity97 16:28, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, no, it has nowhere near enough sources to stand alone as its own separate article — very nearly every source in the entire article is a primary one (i.e. the station's own website), and primary sources cannot confer notability on a topic. Television shows, local or otherwise, get articles on the basis of reliable independent sourcing, not the primary variety. Bearcat (talk) 06:37, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question. CTV Montreal just used to go by the call numbers CFCF-DT before the switch to digital, right? So wouldn't it make sense to incorporate all the info from that article into the history section? If that's the case, CFCF-DT needs to be stripped and updated, anyway. - Sweet Nightmares 20:13, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CFCF-DT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071025234416/http://www.channelcanada.com/Article528.html to http://www.channelcanada.com/Article528.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:28, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]