Talk:C2C

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS to move page per discussion below. -GTBacchus^(talk) 00:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

C2C → C2C (disambiguation) — Not to confuse with c2c and i don't agree that this is misguided. Simply south 16:04, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add # '''Support''' or # '''Oppose''' on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.

Survey - in support of the move

Survey - in opposition to the move

Oppose, useful dab. Voretus 19:52, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, also "c2c" is incorrectly titled - it should be capitalised per WP:MOSTM. Chris cheese whine 02:52, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not according to their official website Here. Simply south 10:30, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MOSTM. Bigger, since you evidently missed it the first time. Chris cheese whine 17:04, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Add any additional comments:

Can anyone explain what the exact problem is? Vegaswikian 00:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.