Jump to content

Talk:C103

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move (May 2006)

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was Not moved.
— V = I * R (talk) 20:11, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cork's 103FM → 103FM County Sound – 103FM County Sound is the stations licenced name, not Cork's 103FM --Kiand 14:23, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moved. —Nightstallion (?) 09:59, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

103FM County Sound → C103 - The station was recently re-branded to C103. 86.45.145.234 (talk) 18:29, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

103FM County Sound→C103 thats its proper nameUktvhistory064 (talk) 10:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was Moved.
— V = I * R (talk) 20:11, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

103FM County Sound → C103 — The station is now called C103, and has been for some time at this stage, please rename it Donal O'Flynn (talk) 02:05, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have attempted to move it myself already, but was unable to as the page C103 is a redirect to 103FM County Sound Donal O'Flynn (talk) 02:08, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sure... this isn't really the important issue to this article, though. There are no references, which calls into question the notability of the station. Some editors regularly take that problem and start AfD discussions to delete the article from Wikipedia, so rather then worry about the name just find some third party verifiable references and add them. Doing that will also quickyl establish any need for a name change, as well.
    — V = I * R (talk) 06:38, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I have now made an effort to improve the article, and will continue to do so. I am currently in pursuit of more and more references to improve the article, and have added some images to better represent the station. I feel that the first few paragraphs are now adequately referenced. It is difficult to find evidence for every single statement made, however I am quite familiar with the station and I believe all of the current information to be accurate. Can someone please move the page to C103, as one of the most inaccurate things on the page is in fact the title! Donal O'Flynn (talk) 23:18, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Much better. It's now completely obvious that the article should be titled C103.
    — V = I * R (talk) 23:56, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on C103. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:06, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on C103. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:42, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:C103&oldid=1200506302"