Talk:Neo-Byzantine architecture

Architecture High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece: Byzantine High‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force.

Russia: Technology & engineering / Visual arts / History Top‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the visual arts in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.

On 17 November 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Byzantine Revival architecture to Neo-Byzantine architecture. The result of the discussion was moved.

Romania?

Constantin Brâncoveanu's page has the following excerpt: "In his religious and laic constructions, Brâncoveanu harmoniously combined in architecture the mural and sculptural painting, the local tradition, the Neo-Byzantine style and the innovative ideas of the Italian Renaissance, giving rise to Brâncovenesc style." Shouldn't there be a mention of this? 92.81.115.213 (talk) 17:06, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Ghirlandajo, your point that there were too many images is well taken and I won't try to re-post them, but I strongly feel that the picture of the Alexander Nevsky Cathedral should be included, even if the number of pictures should remain two.136.160.174.71 05:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I arranged the most representative pictures into a small and nice gallery. I don't think the stub needs more, as long as it is a stub. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 07:13, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It looks good.136.160.174.50 23:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Basilica of St. Paul.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Basilica of St. Paul.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:05, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 November 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 00:56, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Byzantine Revival architecture → Neo-Byzantine architecture – Per WP:COMMONNAME. More common in google scholar ([1] [2]) and also in ngrams ([3]). Note that for ngrams, a few results are for "Byzantine Revival, 780–842", not for an architectural topic. Unfortunately, ngrams search doesn't work for "Byzantine Revival architecture", either because there are very few results or some other issue. Vpab15 (talk) 22:53, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Google books returns 1500 vs 500 results in favour of the proposed title ([4] [5]). Vpab15 (talk) 22:57, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. No such user (talk) 14:33, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.