Jump to content

Talk:Bywell Bridge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed Merge of Bywell with Bywell Bridge

[edit]

It might be better if Bywell is merged with Bywell Bridge. There is not enough information on Bywell Bridge for it to have its own page.

Eteledcomputerapple (talk) 13:51, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. I created the article whilst tidying up the articles on bridges on the River Tyne. The article exists so that there is a full set of articles from the sea up to the junction of the north/south Tyne. I agree that the article is small/brief but that is going to be the nature of some articles in a series like that. Twiceuponatime (talk) 09:12, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bywell Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:04, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]