Talk:Byakuren Kaikan

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 September 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

I don't understand

why there are still issues about "notability" and "references" after all the work that was done to make this page acceptable. There are 23 references in total, most of them are not from primary sources and they include articles on independent magazines as well. Considering this page is not that long are they not enough to prove that the style exist (!) and the information provided is verifiable?

Kagite (talk) 02:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]