Talk:BuzzBuzzHome
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the BuzzBuzzHome article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Still reads somewhat like an advertisement
[edit]When I read this article, it just comes at me like a promotion. The article is almost trying to get me to use BuzzBuzzHome. I'm confident that the Community will fix the problems with the article in time. That's why I accepted it and tagged it with {{Advert}}. Discuss changes here. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 16:47, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
edit
[edit]Removed the line "many big name Canadian land developers" and replaced with "many Canadian land developers" in the Reception section to reduce bias.
BuzzBuzzMax (talk) 19:15, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Infobox
[edit]Could someone add an infobox with the logo at the top and the following information?
Founded Toronto, Canada (2009)
Headquarters 360 Dufferin St. Suite 201, Toronto, ON, M6K 1Z8
Area served Worldwide
Founder(s) Matthew Slutsky, Cliff Peskin
Industry Residential Development
Employees 22
Website BuzzBuzzHome.com
Type of site Listing/Promotional service
Registration Free
Launched May, 2009
Current status Active
I can't figure out how to do this
Done User:King4057 (EthicalWiki) 03:11, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Advert
[edit]I made what I felt were the necessary edits to bring the article in-line with Wikipedia's standards and added the infobox as requested on the Talk page. I made some pretty rough cuts and welcome polishing. The details of how the service works is acceptable, if they can be properly sourced. I don't think this requires a "reliable source" since it is not "likely to be contested" but relying on company published materials to describe its own features exclusively without other sources isn't a good thing. We should also try to avoid editorializing on the market, need, etc. especially when relying on company-published materials, though there is room for a more neutral description of the idea for the company's foundation. User:King4057 (EthicalWiki) 03:35, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Very much agreed, thanks so much for your work! Michaelzeng7 (talk) 17:28, 15 August 2012 (UTC)