Talk:Buzludzha monument
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Vladivelikin.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Shelter
[edit]Isn't there an underground shelter beneath the monument?--Infestor (talk) 12:29, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
pictures of the monument when it was new
[edit]It would be great to have pictures taken of the monument in the early 80s. Are any such around? Wasn't it meant to be a propaganda photo-op factory? Where are those?
Where are the "before" shots? TypoBoy (talk) 20:06, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
the monument deserves its own article
[edit]The subject of this article is Buzludzha, the mountain, but most of its content, including all the photos, references, and external links, is about the Buzludzha Monument.
That information should all be in the Buzludzha Monument article. The limited material we have about the mountain (etymology, region, height, historical event) could live on (along with a linked sentence about the monument) under the current name, or it have a section in the Buzludzha Monument page. TypoBoy (talk) 20:06, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Six months ago, I added the above comment, observing that the mountain and the monument are distinct and the article is named after the mountain but largely discusses the monument. Nobody has responded, but improvements have been made to the article, relating almost exclusively to the monument. So I intend to proceed with the split. TypoBoy (talk) 13:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
I also agree. I'm a PhD researcher based in Bulgaria, and studying the history of the Buzludzha Monument – you'll see I've just updated the page, to include a lot of new information. I have also replaced the link to buzludzha.com with a new reference source – buzludzha-monument.com – as the old site is no longer online. In the interest of full disclosure, I am one of the contributors at this new site... but all the information displayed there is the result of thorough and in-depth research, including interviews with the architect himself.
If you decide to expand this post into two, I will be happy to help. RFMism (talk) 03:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC) I agree with typoboy and jaydb5, these are definitely ways this page could be improved.
Agreed: As this article is mostly about the monument I've moved it to the new title, to preserve the edit history; and I've taken the bits here that are about the mountain and put them at the old title. I trust everyone is OK with that. Moonraker12 (talk) 16:32, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:23, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:53, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
NYT article
[edit]https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/22/world/europe/on-a-remote-mountain-the-sistine-chapel-of-socialism-awaits-its-fate.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytimesworld Xx236 (talk) 07:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
VR Project
[edit]- There is a VR Tour/Project/Game (For Lack of a Better Word) Called "Buzludzha VR" That Showcases The Current State of the Site, Goes over it's History, and showcases what it could look like if remodeled as a Museum.
- Would it be a good idea to add this to this wikipedia page?
- I would assume an "in popular culture" section would be how to implement this? That and/or a link to a dedicated page in the "See Also" subsection
- Relevant Links: