Talk:Buxton Historic Townsite

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Iowa Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Iowa portal This article is supported by WikiProject Iowa (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Iowa may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Proposed Merge

Merge material from [1] to this page? There is more information on the Buxton Historic district on the CCC page than here. I think it would be best to move a lot of the material to this page. Then on the CCC page, there should be some information and a hat for "more information on this page" (I don't remember the name of the hat! ) Please discuss and if there's a consensus, I'll work on it. :) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:12, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agree The two articles have a different focus and I think that should be maintained. It makes sense to move any town information here.Farragutful (talk) 22:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Megalibrarygirl: just checking if you've abandoned this as a project. My view is that either re-organization or status-quo would be fine, as both are linked. So, happy for you to do it, or for the plans to be abandoned, as you prefer. Klbrain (talk) 10:14, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Klbrain! I hadn't (obviously) thought about it for over a year and missed the January note since I wasn't pinged. :( I guess status quo is fine for now, though it could totally be revisited. I'm working on other projects right now. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:11, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]