Talk:Buttolph–Williams House

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Photos

Photos and/or photo uploads are needed.

HABS or HAER photos may be available for this site. Search HABS/HAER here
NRHP photos linked in article, if labelled as NPS-owned and/or taken by NPS employee, would be public domain. Other photos in NRHP document may not be public domain however.
New photos would be helpful.

Photo

I live not far from this area and would be willing to take some photos. I can't promise that I'll do it today, but this weekend I could probably get there. Chrissypan (talk) 13:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whenever convenient, some pics would be appreciated! doncram (talk) 23:50, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NRHP document

As footnoted now in the article, the National Park Service has available an official National Register of Historic Places Inventory/Nomination document (or perhaps it is the alternative document National Historic Landmark Nomination). For almost all National Historic Landmarks, these are on-line, but not for this one. It's a great source to use in developing the article. If anyone is willing, please go ahead and get yourself a free copy (send email request to nr_reference (at) nps.gov. Include your postal mail address, it will be sent by mail and u'd get it in a week or so.) doncram (talk) 23:50, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Buttolph-Williams House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071002043155/http://tps.cr.nps.gov:80/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=801&ResourceType=Building to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=801&ResourceType=Building

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:05, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone fix the HABS photo caption?

Says built in 1692, which is incorrect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:19B:4403:B620:4053:72D3:4690:7448 (talk) 01:13, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]