Talk:Butthole Surfers (EP)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Butthole Surfers (EP)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Article requirements:

Y All the start class criteria
Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
Y At least one section of prose (excluding the lead section)
Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
Y A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
Y Categorisation at least by artist and year
Y A casual reader should learn something about the album. Andrzejbanas (talk) 05:21, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To meet the more rigorous criteria of the revised B class, this article needs improved sourcing to help readers verify the accuracy of information. For example, who says that some of the songs "appear to be either mockeries of, or sloppy attempts to mimic"? Citation would help verify that this is not original research. Where is the source of Biafra's conversation with the band? Additional improvements may also be necessary. (Theoretically, this article can't be more than a "start" without technical personnel listed, but I'm not sure if this information is available. If it is, please add it.) Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Assessment for additional information on B class in album articles. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 18:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 18:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 10:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Do titles have rights?

That said, Brown Reason to Live has a strong claim to title rights, and many fans refer to it by that name.

This implies that the title itself may have rights; "strong claim" appears subjective and opinion; "many fans" is vague and meaningless. Something worded like "The most popular title is...", backed with citation, would be more proper. Mal7798 (talk) 02:05, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Butthole Surfers (EP). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141018034220/http://www.joyfulnoiserecordings.com/journal/top-50-by-nirvana/ to http://www.joyfulnoiserecordings.com/journal/top-50-by-nirvana/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071109125340/http://ngro_obsrvr.tripod.com/articles/feedfish.html to http://ngro_obsrvr.tripod.com/articles/feedfish.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cherryred.co.uk/books/indiehits/b.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:20, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]