Jump to content

Talk:Butterfly style

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Inverted-V style?

[edit]

Now what the hell is the inverted-v goaltending style? — Dorvaq (talk) 20:05, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So the inverted-v style does exist, but the way NHL.com presented it, the style doesn't sound like a style at all. It sounds more like the stance you hold before making a save using the other two styles. I've been a goaltender for 15 years and according to the article, I use the inverted-v style as I wait for shots and then the butterfly style to save the pucks. Anybody else? — Dorvaq (talk) 14:31, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Dorvaq. The inverted-v is a stance, not really a style. Goaltenders can stand with legs parallel to eachother and perpendicular to the ice, but that tends to indicate a stand-up style. Goaltenders will tend to drop knees-over-toes and not get rotation. Inverted V makes it easier to drop the medial portion of the ankles and knees in toward the ice, and making both pads rotate 90 degrees 100% of the time when they are on the knees - this is pro-fly. The Butterfly is overused. All goalies in the NHL use the butterfly to some degree, it's whether they are pro-fly or hybrid types. Toskala, Nabokov are hybrid with Brodeur being the most old-school of all goalies now. — Sh00tr (talk) 18:40, 29 December 2008 (UTC)sh00tr[reply]

Percentage of shots less than a foot

[edit]

Now I don't necessarily question the following sentence;

"This style became very popular after it was calculated that a high percentage of shots on goal are less than a foot in height and is still evolving today."

as I have heard this my entire hockey life, but I believe a reference is important before we add this, thus my decision to revert. In addition, the point about the style still evolving today doesn't fit the rest of the sentence. — Dorvaq (talk) 14:53, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Butterfly style. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Butterfly style. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:22, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Butterfly_style&oldid=1200485010"