Jump to content

Talk:Business routes of Interstate 96/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 02:59, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    The sentence "East of downtown, the spur turned southeasterly past another commercial area to eastern terminus was at exit 77 south of the city." is malformed.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    • Should mention a brief history of the early route designations for each business route, as you do in Business routes of Interstate 69 in Michigan.
    • You should mention how many lanes wide and divided or undivided for the Lansing and Howell business routes.
    • Why is the Farmington route referred to as "Old Business Loop I-96 (Old BL I-96)" and the Detroit route referred to as "Old Business Spur I-96 (Old BS I-96)"? I assume it wasn't prefixed with "Old" when it existed. I think the "Old" mention should be removed as we do not bold it for any other former route unless its an official title.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Pictures of the business loops would be nice to have. Also, It may help to have a map in the infobox showing where all the business routes of I-96 are. However, the lack of neither will hold this article up.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I will put the article on hold for some concerns to be addressed. Dough4872 03:15, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dough4872: updates applied. The reason the two have "Old" in the name is that MDOT uses that in their names as unsigned highways. Imzadi 1979  04:32, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I will now pass the article. Dough4872 04:40, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]