Talk:BusConnects

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ireland Mid‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An image is requested for this article as its inclusion will substantially increase the significance of the article. Please remove the `image-needed` parameter once the image is added.

Transport Low‑importance

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bias Against Bus Connects

Whole article is peppered with conjecture about "controversy" this is Wikipedia not newstalk. No balance. I'd suggest leaving out the politics and stick to the facts of the project. 188.65.190.76 (talk) 12:00, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. RE:

"conjecture". What conjecture? Everything is cited with reliable and verifiable references. Where is the conjecture?
"peppered with [..] controversy [content]". Perhaps 20% of the content deals with related controversies. Given that news coverage (outside Wikipedia) covers related controversies at a much higher level (certainly well over 20%), there is no way that undue weight can be claimed.
"leaving out the politics". Wikipedia is not censored. "Leaving out" a significant aspect of a topic is not appropriate.
"stick to the facts". What facts are missing? What current content is not factual or verifiable?
"bus also has lots of support"[1]. If there are sources to support additions, then please provide them and add related content. Removing cited and verifiable content (which is not WP:UNDUE or problematic under WP:NOCRIT norms) is not the solution to a "where is the coverage of support" concern. Or whatever it is your concern seems to be.

Cheers. Guliolopez (talk) 21:32, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]