Talk:Burn (Meek Mill song)/GA1

GA Review

Passed. N Ø 12:22, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MaranoFan (talk · contribs) 10:59, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this one within 7 days! In the meantime, I would appreciate a review of one I recently put up if you are up to it. Regards.--N Ø 10:59, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Capitalize the "D" in Deluxe and put italics around the bracket so it isn't italicized in the infobox.
There's a MOS:SANDWICH issue with the infobox and the Background and recording section currently. While not mandatory for GAs, this could be fixed by sending the picture to the right side.

Done for the above --K. Peake 07:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is it necessary to bold "Gasoline" in the lead if the song was never released under that title?

Comment: there is a redirect for "Gasoline" that leads here, also this is notable for the lead without adding the full story. --K. Peake 07:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Jahlil Beats handled the production, while he co-wrote it with the rappers and Alexander Izquierdo" → "Jahlil Beats handled the production, and co-wrote it with the rappers and Alexander Izquierdo"
"It was released in digital download and streaming formats as the second single for the album on" → "It was released for digital download and streaming, as the second single for the album, on"
"In the lyrics of the song, Mill and Big Sean offer encouragement of burning." → "In the lyrics of the song, Mill and Big Sean encourage listeners to burn" maybe?

Done for the above --K. Peake 07:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Billboard is not a part of the Bubbling Under chart's name so it could be removed

Not done the chart is published by Billboard, which can be simplified by mentioning the magazine here.

"On October 10, 2012, an accompanying music video was released, set in a warehouse. It shows Mill and Big Sean accompanied by models, crocodiles, and vehicles, with the cars exploding." → "The music video was released on October 10, 2012, which shows Mill and Big Sean accompanied by models in a warehouse, along with crocodiles, vehicles, and exploding cars."

Partly done kept accompanying usage but changed the rest --K. Peake 07:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Background and recording

"Mill contacted Big Sean to work together on "Burn", marking one of the multiple collaborations between Maybach and GOOD rappers." → "Mill contacted Big Sean to work together on "Burn", following several other collaborations between Maybach and GOOD rappers."

Done --K. Peake 07:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"three days before it was included on Mill's ninth mixtape Dreamchasers 2" → "three days before it was released alongside Mill's ninth mixtape Dreamchasers 2" since its inclusion was probably decided upon earlier.

Partly done used as part of instead since the song appears on this mixtape --K. Peake 07:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"crafting it as a continuation of the song and fellow Mill single" → "crafting it as a continuation of the song and Mill's single"
"Jahlil Beats recalled that he first formed the song" → "Jahlil Beats first formed the song"

Done --K. Peake 07:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Composition and lyrics

Maybe link to Brass instrument

Not done already linked in the previous section that talks about recording anyway --K. Peake 07:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Throughout the song, Mill and Big Sean perform back and forth" → "During their performance on the song, Mill and Big Sean go back and forth"
"the rappers implore to "let that shit burn!"" - I'd add "listeners" after implore here as well

Done --K. Peake 07:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Release and reception

"The song was released to digital download and streaming formats in the US as the second single for the album by Maybach and Warner Bros. on September 11, 2012." → "The song was released for digital download and streaming in the US, as the second single for the album, by Maybach and Warner Bros. on September 11, 2012."
"with general praise for the chemistry of Mill and Big Sean" → "with general praise for Mill and Big Sean's chemistry"
"He said the instrumental's "ferocious energy" is matched by Mill and Big Sean, whose differences make them a powerful duo, with the latter being known for "humor and flash without much muscle" and the former for "grit and aggression" with a lack of wit; he concluded that their styles compliment each other." - This is a long sentence so you could split the parts before and after the semicolon
"that it features the mixtape's best rapping with "Sean's witty rhymes" and concluded of his yacht lyrics: "Anchors aweigh!" - comma after the first quote

Done for the above --K. Peake 07:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Jordan Sargent from Pitchfork considered if "Burn" is the best track" - There seems to be an error here

Not done the source uses "maybe" when discussing this --K. Peake 07:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Billboard from the Bubbling Under chart here as well.

Partly done it is not at the start, but I wrote published after the chart because this is more detailed than the lead. --K. Peake 07:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"for the week of August 4, 2012" → "for the issue dated August 4, 2012"
Add the year after the October 30 date

Done --K. Peake 07:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Music video and other usage

Add the year after the October 10 date
"where Big Sean joins Mill and they are accompanied by female models" → "where Big Sean and female models join Mill"

Done --K. Peake 07:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Charts

Looks good!

Certifications

Good. I hope the ability to make these unsortable is added to the template soon, lol.

You're not the only reviewer that has said this, I'm even starting to bank on it too! --K. Peake 07:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

Ref 27 should cite MTV News as publisher.

Done --K. Peake 07:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great work with the refs! This part is perfectly formatted.

Final comments and verdict

Putting this On hold! I'll read through the article again once the comments are addressed but I doubt I will have much to add.--N Ø 21:14, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Covered everything and read through to be sure; any points of disagreement have been provided with reasoning and thanks for this! --K. Peake 07:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After a brief copyedit, I am ✓ Passing this! Stellar work as always.--N Ø 12:21, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.