Talk:Burma campaign (1944–1945)/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Burma campaign (1944–1945). Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Burma National Army position
When I first created this page, I placed the Burma National Army as Allied combatants, and Aung San as an Allied commander. In the latest version, the BNA has been moved to the Japanese side, while Aung San remains an Allied commander, albeit under a British Commonwealth flag which I am sure he would have refused to acknowledge in his lifetime.
To the best of my knowledge and research, the BNA did not participate in any serious fighting on the Japanese side (being mainly stationed in Rangoon and Southern Burma), and defected en masse in March, 1945. Their contribution to the Allied effort may have been minor, but spared the Allies the necessity of suppressing a pro-Independence guerrilla movement during the remainder of the war.
Hopefully, concensus can be reached on this matter. HLGallon (talk) 05:52, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Gurkhas
Were the Gurkhas who served in Burma part of the Indian Army or the Royal Nepalese Army? A dispute has developed at World War II casualties, an expert on the Burma campaign my be able to clarify this issue.--Woogie10w (talk) 12:47, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- Firstly, few of the troops of the Royal Nepalese Army would have been Gurkhas proper, as this terms strictly refers to only a few tribes and castes within Nepal. The Royal Nepalese Army would have recruited from other, perhaps lower, castes. One source which might be useful is ordersofbattle.com. Combining this with Allen, Burma: the Longest Campaign gives eight regiments raised by the Nepalese Army, three of which (the Kalibahadur Regiment, the Mahindra Dal Regiment and the Shere Regiment) definitely served in the Burma Campaign. By contrast, the Indian Army raised 43 battalions of Gurkhas (including two parachute battalions), at least 23 of which served in the Burma campaign. (Gurkhas also formed the paramilitary 3 and 4 Assam Rifles, which also fought in 1944.) Hope this helps. HLGallon (talk) 23:22, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Burma Campaign 1944–45. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20040803183148/http://www.national-army-museum.ac.uk:80/pages/Second-war/far-east.html to http://www.national-army-museum.ac.uk/pages/Second-war/far-east.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080302225804/http://www.warmuseum.ca:80/cwm/newspapers/operations/burma_e.html to http://warmuseum.ca/cwm/newspapers/operations/burma_e.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20040812160006/http://www.regiments.org:80/wars/ww2/burma.htm to http://www.regiments.org/wars/ww2/burma.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:38, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
CE
Did a bit of a spring clean, used sfn for Allen where the cites had red on, altered wikilinks of unit names to un-blue non title information, scanned for un-English-isms and auto-ed the article. It needs plenty of citations which can be found in the OH volumes.Keith-264 (talk) 18:40, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Burma Campaign 1944–45. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090503114041/http://www.remuseum.org.uk/corpshistory/rem_corps_part16.htm to http://www.remuseum.org.uk/corpshistory/rem_corps_part16.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090503114041/http://www.remuseum.org.uk/corpshistory/rem_corps_part16.htm to http://www.remuseum.org.uk/corpshistory/rem_corps_part16.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:03, 27 July 2017 (UTC)