Jump to content

Talk:Burlington Township High School

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WND

[edit]
  • WorldNetDaily has a very poor reputation for accuracy or fact-checking, so should not be used as a source except WP:ABOUTSELF. I had not noticed that the material was an explicit quote from a WND piece, so should probably have removed the entire quote instead of simply replacing the citation with a tag.
  • This is even more appropriate as it seems that the citation for the school response (itself a primary source) is both broken and non-recoverable.

I therefore am tagging both, and am proposing removing both unless better sourcing can be found. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 04:06, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The WND quote is about a WND source, as described in the article, and WND is the most appropriate source. The school statement is now referenced to the school and not to a link. Alansohn (talk) 04:58, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Quoting the WND has about the same reliability as quoting from a bathroom's graffiti, so is never an appropriate source about a third party. The school statement is unpublished and therefore does not allow WP:Verifiability. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 05:09, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Incidentally, WND is currently under discussion at WP:RSN -- general consensus is for wholesale removal. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 05:25, 5 January 2012 (UTC) )[reply]
In terms of the material being quoted, and given that it is being attributed to WND, WND itself would seem to be an appropriate and reliable source even if it isn't in others. Is there a genuine issue with the material being cited or is the issue one in general with any source attributed to WND? Alansohn (talk) 20:58, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Let's take this through step by step:

  1. The WND has "a poor reputation for checking the facts", "lack[s] meaningful editorial oversight" and is "widely considered by other sources to be extremist".
  2. This means that it is WP:NOTRELIABLE.
  3. This in turn means that it can only be used WP:ABOUTSELF and not for "claims about third parties". Please note that there is no 'quotation' exception to this rule.
  4. This means that material on the Burlington Township High School cannot be cited to WND. If the material in question is sourcable only to WND, then it should not be used at all.
  5. The fact that this material exists only on the WND website no more makes WND "an appropriate and reliable source" than the fact that a piece of graffiti exists only on a bathroom wall makes the wall an appropriate and reliable source for it. It simply means that no "reliable published source" exists for this material, and that it therefore is not WP:Verifiable.
  6. If the views of Scriptures In School had any prominence (and should be given any WP:WEIGHT whatsoever in the article) then they would have been published in a reliable source, not only in an extremist, WP:FRINGE, unreliable source like WND.

HrafnTalkStalk(P) 05:11, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Burlington Township High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:36, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Burlington Township High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:59, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Burlington_Township_High_School&oldid=1200461564"