Talk:Burley in Wharfedale

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Burley in Wharfedale is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hyphenation

This is copied from Matt Palmer's talk page.

... I have a minor question though, should Burley in Wharfedale definitely be hyphenated? I'm pretty sure I've seen it in various places hyphenated but my handy West Yorkshire street atlas does not hyphenate it while it's Lancastrian sister does hyphenate Clayton-le-woods for example so I take it the map editors had some reason not to hyphenate it. As councillor for the area I reckon there's a good chance you've got it right but can you provide some evidence please? MGSpiller 22:08, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - thanks - answer is I dont know - I don't think there is a definative answer. Most atlases do not hypenate (some do seem to), though this may be a matter of policy. the local railway station sign, metro guide, and route planners do. I think to/not to hypenate is more custom than anything. I simply accepted the hypenation when I clicked a link from another article (menston) and got 'this article does not exist yet', and made it consistent, but speaking to a few local residents who know these things I get very mixed messages. I certainly have no problem (or preference) either way. I belive the origin of the hypenation is usually to make it clear that the 'in wharfedale' is part of the place name and not simply a description of geogrphical location. For an encyclopedia it may, therefore, be redundant. I do not hypenate it in normal use. Matt Palmer 19:05, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Name

There is a difference between the Village of Burley in Wharfedale and the civil parish of Burley. the parish also covers other settlements, including Burley in Woodhead. Burley in Wharfedale does not. As this article relates to the village of Burley in Wharfedale, can I suggest it's name be changed back to the correct name for the village, and if necessary a seperate page created for the Parish of Burley? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt Palmer (talk • contribs) 20:35, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I have had to undo a lot of this users non consensus page moves in the past. Jeni ^(talk)_(Jenuk1985) 21:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What about all the information relating to the civil parish in the article? eg population. Plus the parish of Burley, West Yorkshire now incorrectly points to just Burley in Warfedale, what about Burley Woodhead? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.182.168 (talk) 08:51, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]