Talk:Buried by the Times

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Rationale for POV tag

An individual contacted the Wikimedia Foundation observing that this book has been reviewed quite a number of times, generally positively, yet this article devotes a material portion of the text to a quote from one critical review.

I think it would be helpful if editors could read some of the other reviews, and determine how best to cover the critical commentary.

I haven't done an exhaustive search, but here are two examples, and there are several others:

I have taken the first step by putting in more representative reviews. I do need to clean up even those references. My next step will be rewrite the text above the Reception section and remove parts that don't really relate to the book.--Joel Mc (talk) 12:21, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I plan to do more on this, but it seems to me that we can lift the POV tag already. Any objections. The Etcetera section doesn't seem to belong to the book, but to Leff's research. She no longer has her own page. Should we delete section or?--Joel Mc (talk) 11:41, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I haven't got the references right yet, will work on it later.Joel Mc (talk) 14:07, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the tag is no longer appropriate, unless there are any objections, I will remove it on 3 November --Joel Mc (talk) 14:00, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Buried by the Times. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080917120856/http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/focus/antisemitism/voices/transcript/?content=20080703 to http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/focus/antisemitism/voices/transcript/?content=20080703

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:50, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Format

Making note of this link as much for my benefit as anyone's: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Books/Non-fiction_article needs to be followed here, and it isn't. Coretheapple (talk) 00:05, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oregon State University lecture

The current link (in External links) is broken. Would it be better to replace it with https://media.oregonstate.edu/media/t/0_p5lybac7 or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmOvcYT_48c or include both links? Mcljlm (talk) 00:38, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quotes

It would be better for references quoting Leff to be to the book's pages as is the case with citations 2 and 8 or at least added. The article's first Beckerman-Leff quote ("500,000 persons ...") is on p.221, the second ("I have been trying to instruct ...") on p.192.

The citation 1 link, Goldman, is broken. Perhaps the references could be replaced with citations to the pages to which Goldman as quoted in the article appears to be referring. Mcljlm (talk) 03:30, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]