Jump to content

Talk:Burger King grilled chicken sandwiches

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scratchpad

[edit]
  • name="CT-BK Broiler" Ryan, Nancy (15 October 1990). "Versatile Chicken Takes Turn On Grill". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 19 November 2013.

GA1

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:BK grilled chicken sandwiches/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zanimum (talk · contribs) 20:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems fairly solid, and I'm almost done the two GANs I'm currently reviewing, so I'll take this as my next project. -- Zanimum (talk) 20:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TYVM, --Jeremy (blah blahI did it!) 01:18, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Passing "Product description", "Advertising" (interesting how much info there is on the campaigns).

"Notes" is entirely about their trademarks, so why is it separate from "Trademarks"? -- Zanimum (talk) 02:45, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Notes section is for the citations for the trademark information. Instead of having half a dozen individual inline citations in the text for each nation's intellectual property authority, I chose to put one simple, small link in the text and put the citations in the notes section. It is an editing and aesthetics decision on my part and is based on the structure used in the Whopper article. --Jeremy (blah blahI did it!) 18:54, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's fair, thanks! Passing "Trademarks" and "Notes". -- Zanimum (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to wait for you to finish looking over the article before working on the suggestions you make. --Jeremy (blah blahI did it!) 08:41, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I will finish this this week, I have a death in the family that requires my focus elsewhere for the next few days.--Jeremy (blah blahI did it!) 08:59, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Second round

[edit]

 Done--Jeremy (blah blahI did it!) 20:18, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Drat, I must have gremlins in my computer. I reviewed more of the article this morning, but can't find where I save it.

Passing "BK Broiler", "Chicken Whopper", "BK Baguette", "TenderGrill".

Competitive products

  •  Not done I don't think "By early-1991" needs a hyphen.
    I'm using the Chicago Manual of Style, which states that this type of format is hyphenated in noun and adjective forms (adjective-noun).
  •  Not done Not necessary, but you might consider a bit of sentence or two more on KFC, considering the reference in the BK Broiler section. Not necessary for a pass, but something to consider.
    That is an interesting idea, but the amount of research would be rather time consuming.

Images all pass.

Lead, infobox, references remain unreviewed. -- Zanimum (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Third round

[edit]

 Done --Jeremy (blah blahI did it!) 20:18, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead and infobox are passes, I'll just make sure there's nothing heinous in the references tonight. -- Zanimum (talk) 22:31, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Done The book excerpt on GMA's site: what does that have to do with Ad Age? They're mentioned once way down in the article.
    I have no idea what happened with that citation, it was all messed up.
  •  Done Burger King menu - Middle east --> Middle East.
    I fixed all instances so that they read Middle East.
  •  Not done Did any media outlet use the Center for Science in the Public Interest press release?
  • The Chicago Tribune did but there is no direct link. The site returns a 404 error. The other sites were not reliable.
  •  Not done There should probably be a [sic] in the "Franchisees on BK Kid's Club" title, as the apostrophe is unnecessary.
    That is the name of the article title, with the apostrophe.

Otherwise, the sources all seem to be quality.

I think that's it for the article. -- Zanimum (talk) 22:15, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So, how goes? -- Zanimum (talk) 18:34, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm finished. --Jeremy (blah blahI did it!) 05:33, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, was checking on the sic on the help desk, got a reply, but the last couple days have been an ice storm where I am. Passing. -- Zanimum (talk) 18:10, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Zanimum (talk · contribs) 20:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move

[edit]

The full proper name should be used not the acronym which is not a COMMONNAME either. Ie- move to "Burger King..."(Lihaas (talk) 16:02, 2 February 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

BK - Like the link? --Jeremy (blah blahI did it!) 06:16, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move to Burger King grilled chicken sandwiches. There is a clear consensus to retain the plural. Armbrust The Homunculus 15:00, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


BK grilled chicken sandwichesBurger King grilled chicken sandwich – I am recommending two changes to this article's title: 1) plural to singular and 2) abbreviation to full phrase. I recommend the singular form because of our naming conventions with respect to plurals, which state that "Wikipedia articles should have singular titles." I recommend switching "BK" to "Burger King" for several reasons. Firstly, it is more consistent with the title of the main article, Burger King. Secondly, this article's title is a common noun phrase, not a proper noun phrase like BK Chicken Fries, and therefore the existence of an official or marketing name does not apply here. Thirdly, our policy on article titles tells us to use commonly recognizable names, and spelling out "Burger King" makes the title more recognizable. Furthermore, a Google Books search reveals more hits for "Burger King grilled chicken sandwich" than for "BK grilled chicken sandwich". Neelix (talk) 04:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Hatnote

[edit]

The hatnote linking to Burger King products and List of Burger King products should be removed from this article. Our guideline regarding hatnotes that link to articles that are related to the topic makes it clear that such links are an improper use of hatnotes. Neelix (talk) 17:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The section you link to is in regards to disambiguation hat notes (Disambiguation hatnotes are intended to link to separate topics that could be referred to by the same title). This links back to the two parent articles that are in summary style, as listed here. --Jeremy (blah blahI did it!) 21:00, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The guideline about the "main" link you mention is about putting links in subsections linking to subarticles, not as hatnotes at the top of articles linking to parent articles. Wikipedia:Hatnote is explicitly against placing these links at the top of articles. Neelix (talk) 16:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of Tendergrill is not reflective of current product

[edit]

I don't know the procedure and rules for getting a new photo in (I don't have a pic myself) but I just was at Burger King and the Tendergrill I got matches the picture on their website which shows a brioche style bun that doesn't at all resemble the one at the top of this article.

Link to BK product page Cransdell (talk) 16:36, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Burger King grilled chicken sandwiches. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Burger King grilled chicken sandwiches. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:58, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Burger King grilled chicken sandwiches. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:21, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]