Talk:Bureaucracy (book)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Libertarianism Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Low-importance).

2010 comment

"To 'increase output' and 'minimize production time' are concepts that cannot be applied to something like a hospital or a police department."

The word "hospital" should be REMOVED from this sentence. Most Libertarians, and almost all Austrian school economists believes that there is a perfectly fine profit motive for healthcare. I have actually just finished reading this book which has led me to this page. Mises only advocates bureaucracy for police department/security. The word "Hospital" should most definitely be removed from this phrase. I'm not a Wikipedia expert, I don't know if this is how you properly start a discussion, but someone who is familiar with Wikipedia procedure, look into this for me, and for Mises' sake please! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.79.123.196 (talk) 17:40, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]