Talk:Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Dear reader,

Below I will publish a major revision of this article, however I would like to be careful before changing something which is not allowed. Therefore I first publish it here (I believe that is the right method) Any remarks (especially concerning sentence structure) are welcomed. I would like to move it to the live part as soon as possible

The major changed contain, added sections: Unique status, Models, Operations also Further Readings is added and a reference list.

Also some of the already available information is moved to fit better to the belonging subject. And it is more in style comparison with the Dutch article.

In the future I would like to translate it to the Dutch article too (I will translate it then), but first it should be handled here.

Hopeful for remarks

With kind regards,

Quirienraat (talk) 17:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(here comes the new article)

I think it needs some copy edit but it is a major improvement over the current text. I tried some improvements in the text below, but being Dutch myself may not be best suited to tinker with English style. Arnoutf (talk) 18:37, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For clarity, I've merged the text into the article and removed it from the talk page. – Editør (talk) 13:25, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]