Talk:Burari deaths

Death: Suicide Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Suicide task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

October 10 to 16, 2021

Archives

Archive 1

sources to be used

lasting effect

—usernamekiran(talk) 23:03, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bhatia vs Chundawat

Can you guys help with the family's last name? I am stuck there. Some sources say it is Bhatia, some say Chundawat. —usernamekiran(talk) 21:30, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use Bhatia --DBig Xray 21:46, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333: requesting your suggestion here. —usernamekiran(talk) 23:01, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DBigXray: I am not sure if Bhatias use Sing in their names, but Chundawats do. —usernamekiran(talk) 23:03, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would say if if you can't think of a clear and obvious infobox to use, don't add one. If the article is improved and expanded, one should appear via the natural course of editing. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 23:06, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333: I apologise for the vagueness. I was asking about the family name. Which one should be used? —usernamekiran(talk) 23:34, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A spot-check of sources suggest "Bhatia", so go with that. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 23:39, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

this explains the confusion in family name. Per WP:COMMONNAME Bhatia should be mentioned, but a 1 line clarification be added that Real family name was Chundawat.--DBig Xray 17:23, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hi @Usernamekiran: Please confirm that you have read what WP:COMMONNAME and WP:MAINSTREAM. Also read Wikipedia:Verifiability,_not_truth. The popular name in the neighbourhood and media is Bhatia, it is wrong to obliterate any mention of Bhatia from the article. You may have your own opinions but here we follow some policies, so kindly self revert as this edit is clearly against Policies. If you disagree to self revert, kindly state your reasons along with Policy in support.

..., my father came to be known as Bhatia saab, a title which stayed with him for years,” he said

[1] It clearly says its the Common name for years (in the neighbourhood) which is why media is using and so should Wikipedia. albeit with a line that family name is Chundawat) --DBig Xray 11:44, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Off100

Off100 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4080:3EAF:A417:4554:D8D9:5CA:9E71 (talk) 08:02, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Off100 2409:4042:4CBF:D334:0:0:608B:A812 (talk) 21:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

765842

Xykxhdugldudkxjv

K jvkv 2409:40C2:204E:1D87:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 11:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect English

"[...] could not stand and hence should be laying on the bed" is grammatically incorrect, but I'm not sure what the intent is, so I can't correct it. I'm thinking either "could not stand, and hence should be lying on the bed", which is correct grammar but makes little sense, or "could not stand, and hence should be laid on the bed", which maybe makes more sense. You should add the comma, too, so that the "and" doesn't sound like it's beginning a list. 2601:600:A480:4C20:E551:902E:F0D3:1953 (talk) 03:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ofno 100 2409:4080:8D3F:22A4:F7C5:C57D:83C6:B726 (talk) 07:38, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]