Talk:Bumble Bee Foods/Archives/2013

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 09:55, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Logo?

Any possibity of adding their logo to the info box? A minor issue, but would be nice. Surv1v4l1st ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 19:36, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Name

Where did they get the name Bumble Bee for salmon or tuna products? The official web page does not explain it. JoeBrennan (talk) 16:48, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

I believe it came from the name of a boat in the fleet. Needs checking though. --Truantfaith (talk) 07:09, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Section on Prop 37 Opposition Removed

I removed this section, which referred to political contributions made by the company to an organization opposing Proposition 37, which would have required labeling of all GMO food in California, and which stated that there was "growing support" for a boycott of BumbleBee as a result.

My concern here is that this is an attempt to use Wikipedia for political purposes, as this exact same section was added to every Wikipedia article describing a company that contributed to the anti-37 effort, by the same individual and using the same language, in the immediate aftermath of the defeat of Prop 37.

The inclusion of this material gives this particular issue undue weight, as corporation routinely contribute to political and public advocacy groups when they see it in their financial interest to do so. If every one of these contributions was noted in the company Wikipedia entry, with its own Section, these articles would be little more than a duplication of the Open Secrets website.

Further the language is decidedly non-neutral. No citation is provided to support "growing support" for this boycott, which has not appeared in the mainstream media since it was announced last September.

With due respect to those who modified all these articles, I think it is inappropriate to politicize Wikipedia in this way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alfred Bertheim (talk • contribs) 01:36, 17 February 2013 (UTC)