Talk:Bully for Steve/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 03:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Nothing witty to say, so let's get to it, then.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- There's a few unusual turns of phrase in here that I'd like to see gone - "as they all wrote and directed its previous episode" should be "the previous episode", for example, whilst "Stan models as a bully" seems bizarre. Having not seen the episode, I'm going to assume this is a mangling of the phrase "poses as", which would be better. I'll probably change these myself though, if they prove to be the only issues.
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- MOS compliant, no problem there
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Decently sourced
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Citations are made appropriately
- C. No original research:
- No OR here, everything is verifiably cited.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Hits all the points it needs to
- B. Focused:
- Doesn't stray into stranger lands, stays with the episode in question
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Seems neutral. Reception section is mostly positive but it seems that's simply due to the overall reception being mostly positive, so not an issue.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- History is stable. Many edits but nothing contentious or debated.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Lead image is the only one, and it seems to pass fair use to me.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Lead image is used in the correct place and captioned appropriately. Article does not strike me as needing further images so this being the only one is not a negative.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Overall I'm going to pass this as a Good Article. The only issues I found with it were some grammatical oddities, but given the relative triviality there, I'll go ahead and fix those myself.
- Pass or Fail: