Talk:Bullet graph
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Seeking clarity
[edit]In the first paragraph, the wording "seemingly inspired by" is used. This is confusing: if bullet graphs are actually inspired by the other graphs mentioned then we should say so; if it isn't, then why mention that they appear as though they might be? Jkshapiro (talk) 17:10, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bullet graph. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070822204929/http://www.datapigtechnologies.com:80/flashfiles/ExcelBulletGraphs.html to http://www.datapigtechnologies.com/flashfiles/ExcelBulletGraphs.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
IBCS® suggests three improvements
[edit]As can be seen by the article of Juergen Faisst at LinkedIn (External references list) IBCS® suggests three improvements which should be taken into account in practical applications of bullet graphs:
1 Omit the third range (light gray) because it has an arbitrary length 2 Normalize target values to facilitate visual evaluation 3 Highlight variances in order to understand the chart more quickly — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uwseidl (talk • contribs) 16:00, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Poor Quality Article
[edit]This article seems more like a blog post than a Wikipedia article. Needs to be flagged for style. If I had any Wiki experience, I'd do this myself, but I'm not... --158.180.128.10 (talk) 10:20, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Apparent Copyvio on images
[edit]The images in the article seem to violate [[WP:COPYVIO]. I tagged the images in Commons and they can be disussed there. Review this source Perceptual Edge.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:20, 13 August 2024 (UTC)