Jump to content

Talk:Bulkhead (partition)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Who invented

[edit]

Not Benjamin Franklin:

As early as 1784, Franklin suggested following the Chinese model of dividing ships' holds into watertight compartments so that if a leak occurred in one compartment, the water would not spread throughout the hold and sink the ship.

mikka (t) 06:38, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Scope

[edit]

The scope of this article is really confusing, as it seems to focus on ship bulkheads, but is couched as "Bulkhead (partition)". I suggest renaming to make this clearer. How about "Bulkhead (structure)", or else "Bulkhead (ship)", and punt other uses to separate pages, such as "Bulkhead (aircraft)", for example. Either way, some work probably needs to be done to the disambiguation page for Bulkhead. 70.251.150.167 (talk) 20:02, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There needs to be a disambiguation to differentiate "Ship's Bulkhead" from "Basement Bulkhead", a possibly equally common term which needs a different entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.228.112.22 (talk) 01:19, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not just on ships

[edit]

Perhaps it should be mentioned that "bulkhead" is also used to refer to just walls in a building on shore, on Navy bases, especially at naval training facilities. Same goes for "deck". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.215.202.124 (talk) 23:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Section

[edit]

This statement, while an interesting historical note, did not belong in the etymology section. I have removed it, but I feel that it would be nice to have it somewhere else within the entry.

The Song Dynasty Chinese author Zhu Yu wrote of Chinese ships with watertight bulkhead compartments in his book Pingzhou Table Talks of 1119 AD. A Chinese trade ship dated to 1277 AD was found off the southern coast of China in 1973, and had 12 bulkhead compartment rooms in its hull.

-Athaler (talk) 16:59, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cable discussion seems extraneous

[edit]

The paragraph discussing EMP includes statment about cabling which doesnt belong here

DGerman (talk) 10:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bulkhead (partition). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bulkhead_(partition)&oldid=1213090060"