Talk:Bulgarian Wikipedia

This article was nominated for deletion on February 18, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Wikipedia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

Bulgaria Mid‑importance

	Bulgaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

NOR.

I have recently removed some material (see history & edit comments) that appeared to be original research and speculation — content that was not verifiable at a reliable, pre-published source. I hope this doesn't bother anyone too much, but encyclopedic standards need to be upheld, even when an article is about Wikipedia itself. --Ds13 19:32, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote some of that "original research". I see you didn't remove everything I wrote. Before I read your updated version I was looking at some statistics again for the Bulgarian Wikipedia. I don't think the only heading in the Bulgarian Wikipedia page should be "Slow growth" or anything to that effect. I think it's really misleading. A lot of the statistics are much better than for a lot of the other wikipedias out there, even the ones ranked ahead of the Bulgarian Wikipedia. --Vanka5 06:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind at all. In fact this revision was mine and I accept the accusations of speculation. I wtore this at that point, because I was really afraid that our version of the encyclopaedia was slowly dying out. Unfortunately the current state proves I was right in my fears. We have long ago lost momentum. Anyhow, my analysis from then is largely irrelevant today. --Cryout 00:49, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling?

We've been getting strange emails at WP:OTRS about a spelling change. Can anyone explain what's going on? -- Jeandré, 2007-04-09t18:26z

If the requests concern articles on bg:, please tell them to ask at bg:У:Р (community's general talk page), or if a privacy is needed, to contact us at infoBG-L (at) wikimedia (dot) org. --5ko 20:52, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ack! I confused bg with Belarusian be: http://be-x-old.wikipedia.org/ Sorry.-- Jeandré, 2007-04-10t20:03z

Mobile version

The homepage for the Bulgarian Wikipedia has not yet been converted to a mobile phone version, at http://bg.m.wikipedia.org WhisperToMe (talk) 18:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]