Talk:Buldhana

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Buldhana article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Maharashtra Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Mid-importance).

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.
	This article is not assigned to a workgroup. Please help with your suggestions.
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Confusion

At some point this article and Buldhana district have become hopelessly mixed up. This article is about the city, but somebody added a hatnote claiming it was about the district, despite another article existing under that name. The mess needs to be sorted, and information (where it isn't duplicated) that refers to the district should be transferred to that article. Skinsmoke (talk) 10:32, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@Skinsmoke: yes. I edited the template. But i couldnt input all the data. Would you please help me with that? —usernamekiran (talk) 03:28, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try. What is the problem? Skinsmoke (talk) 03:33, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Buldhana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090306045236/http://164.100.9.199:80/ecimaps/ecipdf/state_pc_Map/Maharashtra.pdf to http://164.100.9.199/ecimaps/ecipdf/state_pc_Map/Maharashtra.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox template

This article of buldhana city had the infobox/information as a District. This has been changed on March 7, 2016; IST. Further work is required to be performed on the template. For this purpose, information with "unknown" parametres has been left intact. —usernamekiran (talk) 03:24, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Skinsmoke: the infobox is the problem. —usernamekiran (talk) 03:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give me a clue? Everything appears to be working normally. What are you trying to do that isn't working? Skinsmoke (talk) 04:02, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Skinsmoke: it appears to be normal. But in the source code, there is more information that is not being reflected. Like the literacy rate, and gender ration. Kindly take a look at yavatmal. It is a city from same devision. —usernamekiran (talk) 04:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamaguchi先生: Hi. Thanks for the edit. It was very good. But I couldnt understand the edit summary would you please elaborate? —usernamekiran(talk) 23:45, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]