Talk:Buffalo wallow

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Splitting the article

@MuZemike: It seems obvious to me that this article needs splitting into Buffalo wallow and Battle of Buffalo Wallow. I was about to create Battle of Buffalo Wallow but I was alerted that a previous version from 2012 has been deleted by user:MuZemike. It appears this was due to it being created by a sock. What do you and others think about me splitting the article. DrChrissy ^(talk) 16:47, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DrChrissy: Recreation should be fine. However, restoration would not be, as the article was deleted also per WP:COPYVIO concerns (the user was operating a small sockfarm of accounts whose creations were almost entirely copyright violations). I have no opinion on splitting, just providing some background information. --MuZemike 19:31, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for that - much appreciated. DrChrissy ^(talk) 20:14, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]