Talk:Buff striped keelback

	Buff striped keelback is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments, anyone

This is the first time I got such detailed pictures and could illustrate it so lavishly. Comments please. AshLin 17:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Classification

Looks like this one's going to be called Amphiesma stolata after all: "Amphiesma stolata". Integrated Taxonomic Information System. 5 August. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help) McDiarmid's second volume isn't out yet, but apparently stolata takes precedence over stolatum in his 2004 draft. The EMBL also agrees: Species Amphiesma stolatum at The Reptile Database .

McDiarmid's 1999 checklist, "Snake Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, vol. 1," is what ITIS uses for its classification of snakes. It's been described as the most significant reference work since Boulenger's 1893-1896 checklist, "Catalogue of the Snakes in the British Museum," and is about as authoritative as you can get these days.

Otherwise the article looks okay... except that you need to cite your references (not just list them). If you've seen any of my work, you'll know that I'm pretty fanatic about this, but in my opinion it's the best way (and our only option) to convince readers that they should take our articles seriously. This is currently an important issue, as Wikipedia recently received a lot of criticism for not being accurate enough. --Jwinius 12:43, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Rating

I've marked this as in need of attention. With inline citations, this article could very well be a GA candidate. J. Hall • ^(Talk) 16:19, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Buff striped keelback. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051203120138/http://www.calacademy.org:80/research/herpetology/myanmar/checklist_snakes.html to http://www.calacademy.org/research/herpetology/myanmar/checklist_snakes.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:38, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Buff striped keelback. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.calacademy.org/research/herpetology/myanmar/checklist_snakes.html
Added archive https://archive.is/20130415082847/http://www.indiansnakes.org/Snakedatabase/keelbacks/striped/striped_keelback.html to http://www.indiansnakes.org/Snakedatabase/keelbacks/striped/striped_keelback.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:01, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]