Jump to content

Talk:Buddhology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have just laid out a few topics here. As I suggested on the Buddha - God or Man talk page, it would seem to be a good idea to construct the article in a sandbox first.--Stephen Hodge 01:38, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stephen, the first reference was all mixed up, placing the citation of "whoever sees the dhamma sees me" at Kh.XXII.87(13), which, obviously, was incorrect (there are only 9 sections to the Khuddakapatha, and none of them contain this phrase). I corrected it to the SN Khandha Samyutta; Vakkali sutta with two citation strategies, the first refering to volume, chapter, sutta number in chapter (sutta number by section in parentheses), the second being PTS Roman indexing by volume and page number. That should help folks find the passage. -- Vacchagotta 15:59, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

who uses "buddhology"?

[edit]

and if someone uses it, it should be about Buddha the concept, not Gautama Buddha (common errors that are corrected after studying buddhology 101)--Esteban Barahona (talk) 04:19, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Buddhology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]