Talk:Buddhist atomism

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Changing Links page

Hey Wiki masters: I changed the Buddhist atomism links. If you think that they indicate vanity in any way, I hope you remove them. I added them merely because the links seems a little sparse, but do what you think best.

"Aristotelian-style atomic theory"

Since Aristotle rejected atomism, I'm a bit puzzled what the article means by an Aristotelian-style atomic theory. --SteveMcCluskey 02:22, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you prove that Aristotle rejected atomism? I thought he accepted it, with his so-called minima? It is sort of hard to figure out what Aristotle wanted us to think. But aside from that, I agree with you that mention of Aristotle here in the contexts of the Buddhsts seems, well, not at all necessary and a needless stretch of non-comparison.