Talk:Buddhism and democracy

Buddhism Mid‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

modern views section

Added Shamar Rinopoche's book, contemporary book about reforming government corruption.Badabara (talk) 04:52, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Separation of church and state

I think it's valuable to consider examples where Buddhism and Statehood were not separated. Tibet's longstanding Feudalistic society with Monastic power is a history we don't want to repeat.Badabara (talk) 05:20, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

restructuring for readability

I made changes to the page. Restructured categories and edited grammar to make the page concise and readable. Let me know if there are changes I made that you don't agree with. Badabara (talk) 18:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is this?

"Though some historic Buddhist societies have been categorized as feudalistic, the relationship between peasants and land owners was often voluntary. Free-thinking Buddhist societies supported autonomy; peasants had mobility and could own land themselves."

What does this have to do with democracy? 216.8.174.241 (talk) 12:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's basically saying, "even though many early buddhist societies are classified as feudalistic, they actually had qualities of Democracy". Badabara (talk) 03:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peasants having mobility and owning land is not democracy. 216.8.174.241 (talk) 11:14, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]